>>>>> Internet Marketing Blog

Archive for the ‘Google’ Category

Stop Words Becoming Increasingly More Relevant to Domains and Search

Wednesday, November 19th, 2008

Stop words are words that search engines, like Google, traditionally ignore in searches. For that reason, they’ve been shunned by SEO specialists in regards to how they name domain names, page titles and other keyword-centric onsite SEO elements. However, that strategy has been changing lately, because search algorithms are starting to include stop words in their SERPs more often than not.

Black Hat Domainer recently brought the stop word discussion up as it pertained to domainers. The writer pointed to a patent Google submitted on January 15, 2008 that stated:

Typically, given a query, the performance bottleneck is the time it takes to decode the occurrences (which are typically delta encoded to save space, and thus have to be followed from the beginning) of the most frequently occurring term, especially if this term is a so-called stop-word such as “the”.

This change can be easily seen by doing a search for “the car” and “car“. The domain thecar.com comes up as the third result on the first page, but can’t be found on the non stop word search. I even checked with Aaron, a domainer at The Mad Hat, and he confirmed that he tested this technique a while back and that using stop words in domains does work.

Assuming that this trend continues, we might see a new rush on domain names — ones that contain a variety of stop words. My guess is that “the” will lead the pack and will be followed by words like “about,” “for” and possibly “what.” Of course, many of these words have already been used in domains that target the vernacular of their intended audience. So, for those who are already using them, they should theoretically experience a boost in the SERPs, assuming they haven’t already.

Make Google Your What?!?!

Thursday, August 28th, 2008

You heard me, make Google your bitch!. Come join the fun at Barcamp Nashville, October 18, 2008 from 9AM to 4PM.

Barcamp Nashville

Google Changes Rules On Nofollow - Forgets To Send Memo

Wednesday, August 20th, 2008

Oh sweet “nofollow!” I use you on my blog to keep my link juice from spilling out onto the shady, dark world of the Internet underbellies. I even use you to sculpt my sites, hoping to wrangle PageRank and content into my own little silo of SERP love. Yet you are fickle and have proven to be a lying, cheating bastard.

You might be asking, “why all the prose?” And by prose, I know you mean really crappy melodrama. It’s because Google keeps changing the rules, but keeps their public message the same. I find this both irritating and also brilliant. Such is the case with the infamous rel=”nofollow” attribute.

The nofollow attribute is supposed to behave. It’s supposed to not let search engines follow its links. It’s supposed to do what we’ve been told by Google what it’s supposed to do. Unfortunately, it doesn’t do that. Instead, relevance and juice still seems to get past it. How do I know this, because we’ve experimented with it — experiments I’m unwilling to share to protect the identity of the not-so-innocent.

The biggest place that we’ve seen the offense is with blog comments. We’ve recently found that the anchor text and links that are supposed to be nofollow’d by Google are doing quite well. In fact, we’ve done (loose) experiments with unique anchor text — using the anchor text only on blog comments that were nofollowed — and have found them ranking #1 and #2 on Google. Let me repeat, we never built any other links with anchor text remotely close to the anchor text we used on those comments, yet we got results from it as if it had been dofollow.

We’ve only seen this recently in the past few months, which leads me to believe that Google is fiddling with their algorithm and changing the rules with nofollow once again. But like the government, we won’t find out about it until it doesn’t even matter anymore.

The Last Shall Be First

Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008

At least that’s true if you’re unlucky with Google. As a follow up to Search Diving on “Live” for Fun, Amusement and Mild Pleasure, we present to you Google Last, the most unlucky search on the Earth.

It’s certainly unlucky to be at the bottom of the top 100 results, but it’s even more unlucky to be at the bottom 1,000. However, we think there’s an entire Internet being ignored from all of those lazy searchers who don’t go past the first page of Google. Just a few searches on Google Last resulted in some very interesting websites.

Searching for “seriously” resulted in some serious pr0n, while searching for “unlucky” produced a plethora of hilarious yuk yuks. Isn’t it time the bottom 1,000 got some love? Page 100 is where the cool kids are at, so get going.

Demystifying the Google Algorithm

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Search Engine Journal recently demystified the Google algorithm. It’s really a matter of perspective.

Google Engineer’s Perspective

Search Marketer’s Perspective

Of course this isn’t totally true, and money doesn’t need to be involved, but it’s still damn funny.

Google’s Blog Search is Broken

Monday, January 28th, 2008

I’ve always found Google’s Blog Search to be less then stellar. It’s excellent at indexing, sorting and presenting current blog entries. What it’s not excellent at is returning quality results. However, today it hit an all time low. I was doing some research for a client — searching for “chicago annuity” — and the first page results were basically all spam.

One of the first things I noticed was the keyword stuffing in the blog entry description. As this screenshot shows, having the word annuity in every sentence three times is most definitely keyword stuffing!

Google Blog Search Keyword Stuffing Results

If you look closely, you’ll see that all of the websites are Blogspot (Blogger) websites. Although I didn’t click on all of the links, the ones I did click on had already been designated as spam by the Blogger team.

Blogger Message: This blog is in violation of Blogger's Terms of Service and is open to authors only

It seems like the Google Spam Team isn’t working with the group that runs the Blog Search. These are the type of search results that are long gone from Google’s main search engine, which is why it’s shocking to see it so “spammed” up. With results like this, Google’s blog search is basically useless. Instead of finding the expected mixed bag of results, I now just find spam. I hope they’ll give this some attention soon.

Will Vertical Search Crush the “Do Everything” Search Engine?

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008

Sramana Mitra recently wrote about Google’s Achilles Heel. In her article, she suggested that vertical search engines are Google’s worst vulnerability.

Google has so far stayed focused on horizontal, generic search with a simple, one-bar user interface. And it has brought them a remarkably long way.

However, as users get more sophisticated, they are discovering brands that offer richer user experiences customized to the dynamics of the vertical.

Here’s an example. Let’s say that I’ve been considering a new exercise routine. I’m trying to decide whether I should start running, jogging or walking, so I decide to go to Google and search, “reasons why I should run.” Instead of getting what I’m looking for, I get an article I recently wrote, “Five Reasons Why You Should Run a “Do Follow” Blog.” This of course is fantastic for our website, but it’s not what I was searching for. It’s not until the the third result that I see a related result, “10 reasons why women should run.” That result is certainly closer to what I’m looking for, but I would still be hesitant to click on it, because I’m not a woman.

Search Engine Result (SERP) for reasons why I should run

The remaining results are related to politics — none of which are related to the intention of my search query. That “unrelatedness,” along with close matches that are exclusive (I’m not a woman), is why vertical search engines are the way of the future. Basically, to get better results, I would want to use a vertical search engine. A good example would be a search engine that only focuses on exercise or just running.

However, the problem with vertical search engines is that there are too many of them (or there soon will be), which will create the need for a search engine to find vertical search engines — ridiculous, I know. That problem takes us full circle and back to “do everything” search engines like Google, Yahoo! and Live. So, what’s the solution?

I think the solution is relatively easy, at least from a user interface (UI) perspective. Adding the addition of a category/tag input field could go a long way in returning much more valid results. This of course would wreak havoc on the SEO industry, because it would become even harder (or possibly easier in some cases) to target and track search engine result pages (SERPs). I would envision something as simple as this Google mockup I put together. The first image shows the “hint” language that would go in each input field before the user enters any text, while the second image is an example of the actual search term and subject(s) I would use.

Google Vertical Search Mockup

Google Vertical Search Mockup 2

If Google could correctly apply “subjects” (aka categories, tags, etc…) to individual Web pages and entire websites — which I believe they can and already do in some respect — then updating their interface to work similar to my mockup may save them from the vertical search proliferation.

Google Creates New SEO Opportunities with Patent Application for Reading Text In Images and Videos

Monday, January 7th, 2008

Like most code based SEO enhancements, optimizing an image with text involves utilizing existing accessibility options already built into HTML. For example, adding the text in an image to the ALT attribute into the IMG element will help users with certain disabilities (or users with a text browser, like Lynx) and also provide more copy for search engines to analyze. So as an extra step, prudent webmasters, regardless of their overall purpose, provide alternate text for their images. However, Google may change that practice forever.

Google’s new patent application for reading text in images and videos may make the practice of including alternate text a thing of the past. In addition, it’s something that may open a huge door for SEO opportunities and innovative services. Bill Slawski (of SEO by the SEA) listed several potential uses of this technology if it were used to analyze and associate text in images:

  • Images are Associated with a Mapping Program
  • Images Near Specific Locations are Associated with Each Other
  • Images of Similar Businesses Presented as Alternatives
  • Advertisements Shown with Images
  • Google Interior Images
  • Searching Museums for Images

I think the opportunities for search engine optimization are endless. In the same way that SEO specialists focus on keyword inclusion and repetition in semantically structured HTML documents, new focus will be put on the inclusion of text in both images and videos. In fact, if this technology is widely implemented — in the way I’m assuming it will be — it has the potential to change the way images and videos are used on the Internet. In the same way article titles have changed the way we communicate to both people and bots, we will see a rise in the use of images and videos that have the expressed intention of providing more content for bots to analyze (not just extra content for the user).

Like all new technologies that directly affect search engine results, we will see the rise of a new kind of spam — image and blog spam. For example, expect to see videos that have very little content, but have lots of text that change every few frames. It’s not all bad though. I think this technology will also be used to create original and interesting content. In the same way linkbait is used today, creative search marketers will find ways to create image and video content that takes direct advantage of this technology. A few ideas that come to mind include:

  • Creating linkbait articles, like searching and finding the ten most interesting or funny road signs.
  • A search engine that helps you find posters and flyers for concerts and events.
  • Online treasure hunt games where you follow the trail of certain videos and try to spot a secret code or the next clue to search with.

If this technology is used in the way I think and hope it will be, it has the potential to disrupt the type of content that’s currently being created for the Internet. It will also influence and modify how search marketers approach their SEO campaigns.

Live Search Is Returning Google AdWords Ads In Their Natural Search Results (Updated)

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

Update: Nathan Buggia, Lead Program Manager at Live Search, contacted me to let me know they’ve fixed the problem. Here’s what happened, in their own words.

Live Search is offering a new way for AdWords customers to get click-throughs — their own natural SERPs. They appear to be indexing AdWords ads from Google’s own SERPs. Doing a search on Live for colorations paint (at the time of this writing) will give you AdWords ads in the third and fourth natural result. I can only assume this is unintentional and is simply a bug in their crawler. Regardless, it’s a little embarrassing.

Live Search returns Google AdWords Results

Google Adds “Unicorns Horns” to Their Calculator

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

Collin Winter, an old Sitening employee and now Google engineer, alerted me to how excruciatingly cute they are in Googleville. Apparently, in a night of programming madness, they added the ability to include number of horns on a unicorn into any equation. Don’t believe me? See for yourself.

Sample Equation

unicorn horn equation on Google